Search This Blog

Friday, December 18, 2009

the sad reality of my computer life.

yay I finally uploaded a video!! Anyway, this is the sad reality of my current computer. I would blog more, I would be more a more productive student in general if my screen did not give me a headache, the unit did not get burning hot and if the battery lasted more than 1 hr. I wanted to wait until February when I am back in the US to try a few computers before purchasing, but honestly, I am not sure I can take any more of this!!! I am begging for that next check to arrive so I can get a new computer.

I am deciding between this Acer and this Asus. Any thoughts are welcome. The Acer is less expensive, but the Asus has a 2 year global warranty. I have to get something asap!!!!

About the Canal Zone...

ok I still have not finished Gamboa Road Gang. I have not been reading the way I should, and to be honest, I do not like it (so far) as much as Luna Verde. But I plan to finish regardless, so now I am reading 2 chapters each morning until I am done.

I have not interviewed many people who expressed outrage at the existence of the Canal Zone, the Zonian population, or the American jurisdiction that ruled there. People have used words like "unjust" or "fear" when describing their experiences in the Zone, but no one has become emotional or loud when talking about American presence in Panama (past, present or future). This is really not surprising. (just fyi, the invasion has been the most sensitive and emotional issue during my interviews so far. Four people cried during their recollections , 3 men and 1 woman.)

However, one interviewee did share the sentiments of Jaoquin Beleno, which I will post here, but in a reverse logic. He was born in the US to Panamanian parents, raised in Panama by his grandparents. Interestingly, this man was outraged by the discrimination he experienced from Zone police officers when he was a child not because he was black or Panamanian, but because he was born in the US, is an American citizen(albeit unbeknownst to these officers) and thus has as much entitlement in the Zone as anyone else. He felt since he is an American (he lived in Panama with his Panamanian family, not in the Zone) he should be able to enjoy all the privileges in that Zonian children enjoyed, that the police should be protecting him as well, not punishing him. Perhaps it is my American point of view, but I think it is fascinating that this man does not believe his blackness has anything to do with the treatment he received from white American officers in the 1970s and 1980s.

Anyway, I digress. Here is a passage (sorry English-only readers. It is in Spanish) that I feel summarizes Beleño's view:
(p.85)

Es una infamia condenar a un hombre a trabajar gratis [the work of the road gang] durante largos años para la Compañía del Canal de Panamá, solamente porque lo encontraron cazando iguanas o robar una bicicleta que ya no valía ni cinco dólares. Es denigrante tener que vivir como yo, expatriado dentro de mi propia patria, porque si entro la latifundio de la Zona del Canal me condenan a un ano en Gamboa por infringir las leyes de destierro zoneíta. Ya yo no soy libre en mi país, no puedo transitar libremente por donde quiera, hay un lugar de lagunas e isletas, de faros y de carreteras sembradas de lawn, en donde yo no puedo encontrar. ¿Es eso democracia? ¿Es eso libertad? Si yo cometí un delito y fui condenado, ¿por qué razón los Estados Unidos me siguen condenando aún después de haber pagado mi delito?
...
(86-87)
...Debajo de unos servicios inmaculados y de una pulcritud ejemplar, existe una rapiña que mueve el bajo inter humano. En este latifundio militarmente socialista, en donde todo es Gobierno, como en un Estado fascista, se roba bajo el imperio de la ley. Lo que sucede es que la ley zoneíta es sorda para sus 10,000 zonians y sus soldados, pero dura para negros y mestizos que sólo pueden servir para mano esclava en Gamboa...

it goes on about how American teenagers do the same, and worse, as what non-Americans get put in jail for (hunting iguanas, stealing bikes, being fresh with women). But rather than jail, they either get sent to the US or it is just hushed and dealt with in the family. Clearly, he is not trying to disguise his opinions about this American 'caste' and he calls it. I wonder if I will interview anyone who actually says something similar.

Monday, December 14, 2009

it WAS interesting and I loved it!

Everytime I do an interview I think to myself: I love people.

Sure I have my preconceived notions that I share in this blog. But for the majority of people, despite what I may think or feel, I start fresh when I meet you. I am (professionally) very good at keeping my personal opinions to myself and do not often (professionally) let my emotions or reactions show. People feel comfortable talking to me and that is what (I hope) makes me a sucessful interviewer.

This woman yes, is pushy. Yes, she is loud. And she gave me a great interview, new contacts, some delicious sancocho (it's my kryptonite!!), and very salient food-for-thought.

People are so interesting. Finally! I am enjoying this project and where it is taking me.

oh boy, this should be interesting

I have an interview this morning with one of the pushiest, know-it-all American Panamanian woman I have ever had the experience of meeting.

She just called me to confirm, which is fine, but also to tell me she invited some law professor to join us and that I should be honored that he might take the time to come by.

These statements in and of themselves seem innocuous, but it is the way that she speaks that rubs me the wrong way. Loudly. Without listening. Talking over me after she asks me a question.

Had she asked, no I do not like group interviews much, and prefer to have them one-on-one... This not only helps for the transcription, but protecting the confidentiality of identity and whatever is said. Also, the power dyanmic between the two people can alter potentional responses and stifle ideas. On the other hand, it can spark more animated discussions and trigger memories so we will see how it goes. I am hoping this goes well. I do want to meet him and think he woudl be a great interview. I just do not want to interview them together.

All part of the experience, right?

Saturday, December 12, 2009

the excitement that is 12-12

Today is an exciting day for many reasons!
Today is my aunt's birthday. Happy birthday, Auntie!! She is on a fabulous cruise and will be in Brazil tomorrow. We are not concerned about her having a good time :-) Have an amazing trip!

Today s my line sister Erica's birthday- Happy birthday, Erica!! We are such different people with soooo much in common. I am grateful we were afforded the opportunity to find that out. She is currently finishing her PhD at Harvard so we aren't concerned about her future :-) have a great day! Love you lots.


Today is my dean's wedding. Congratulations, Antonia and Jorge!!!! They are tying the knot today in Rincon, Puerto Rico. awww, I wish I could have been there but alas, I cannot be. Wishing them beautiful weather and a lifetime of happiness and love.


Today is my Tia Tancha's 90th birthday party here in Panama. feliz cumple, Tia Tancha!! So I will be with family and friends of family today celebrating her life. I will do my best to take pictures. :-)


I hope everyone else is having a happy 12-12!
I told you I moved right?? Two weeks ago I moved to El Cangrejo. I have two roommates that I get along with very well. It was a great decision. Here is my new view.

Wednesday, December 2, 2009

Tuesday's interview: setting the scene

For some reason I was expecting a man in a button down collared shirt and tie, or maybe at least a polo style collared shirt. I was misled by his pictures online. Google images skewed my perception! (in retrospect, they could have been photos from performances. He is an actor/director afterall). Also, he always seemed short and unfriendly on the phone. I assumed that to be a professional demeanor, or maybe even a quiet resistance to an interview to which he only consented to appease a friend. So I was a little scared to ask him (again) exactly where the facultad de bellas artes was located. I didn’t even call to confirm the interview although we made it over a week ago. When I suggested I call the day before to confirm, he asked me, “para qué? Acabo de decirle que si, estaré en la oficina el martes.” Um…Ok. So no confirmation call. In my notes I only wrote “Juan Pablo II” and “antes”. (note to self: take better notes) I figured I would ask around the university and someone would know so I did not have to bother him again. Well, that plan was NOT foolproof. After being led to not one, but two incorrect offices, and only 15 minutes until our appointment, I decided to call.

In an almost friendly voice he let me know that he too was running late and would not be there for about 50 minutes; however, he gave me directions (again) even though we were cut off the first time, much to my cab driver's dismay.

I wondered where he was coming from that would take 50 minutes, but did not dare to ask.

I arrived on time, or 50 minutes early, and took an unguided solitary tour of the satellite campus, walked around open hallways, accidentally walked in on a dance rehearsal in the dome (oops! Sorry!), and read some of my book. I asked a few times for the office of theater and almost every time (although some people had no idea at all) I was led through the double doors next to the café, immediately on the right hand side, to the same closed wooden door. It was a door that had both a half and full door handles, as if it was in fact an entry door. Half open, it is an entry office. Fully open, a small office space. I patiently waited in the main hallway on a half broken bench reading my book…or gently dozing off... or some socially tolerable mixture of the two. No one looked at me funny, or if they were, I was sleeping in those moments so I didn't notice :-)

After an hour and fifteen minutes, I was convinced I was in the wrong place, and I asked yet another person for the office for the school of theater. He pointed me to different student who he knew to be a theater student. This light skinned chubby helpful man of at least 30 years with graying hair not only showed me where the office was (same closed wooden door) but when I gave the name of the man I was waiting for, he let me know my interviewee had just arrived and was right in front of me buying a coffee. “esta joven te busca”

When he turned around to face me, I was a bit taken aback. This man was not in a suit. His shirt had no collar. His round wire-rimmed glasses, faded gray stonewashed hat, worn khaki pants and “the clash” faded t-shirt were not at all what I expected. He looked too casual, too accessible to be the same stiff unfriendly man I imagined. Unlike the photos I saw online, his facial hair was shaved off almost completely, leaving a faint trace of a day old five o’clock shadow. His outfit made him seem younger than his 50 years, and for some reason the absence of facial hair made him much less intimidating than I imagined him to be. “Ariana?” he asked, without a smile, but all the same extending his hand to greet me. “Desea algo para tomar?”

He was a difficult read: polite, but not overtly warm. We were strangers after all. (But yesterday’s lunch-with-a-stranger meeting greeted me with a kiss on the cheek. I could see this meeting would not follow suit.) “no, no. tengo una botella de agua. Estoy bien, gracias.”

Since his office was locked (the closed wooden door) and he did not have the key, we went outside, found a bench and began our interview. We warmed to each other. I found his demeanor not aloof or cold, but instead cautious and enjoyable. Despite his being outside of the office, students found him to ask questions. He always excused himself, answered them, and quickly returned to our conversation. When the rains started, we were forced inside for cover and found the closed wooden door was finally open!

Inside this infamous door lay a dreadfully small office. Three worn wooden desks very close together formed the office of teatro at the University of Panama. His desk was in the left most corner of the room. He offered me a seat at the center desk, that of his secretary who was out sick (long story, perhaps to follow), as he put on a black university of Panama jacket to combat the high level of air conditioning. His old leather chair had visible stuffing budding from both arms and I thought to myself: no director of university program in the US would tolerate a chair like this, would they? Once we sat down again, he asked me how I spell my name. I thought it an odd question, but I wrote it out for him anyway. He reached up, grabbed a book from his shelf, and dedicated the copy for me to keep. I was surprised and moved by the present, given my initial (and completely wrong) perception of him. From the hasty way in which he executed the giving he seemed almost embarrassed by the gesture and, once the book was in my hands, wanted to get right back into the interview. I was able to persuade him to read a few poems inspired by his struggles during the 1989 invasion before returning to my premeditated inquiry.

This chair of a university department, a friend of a friend, kindly spent about two and a half hours with me, answering my questions and reliving some extremely emotional and personal moments about the 1989 invasion, the 20th anniversary of which is December 20, 2009. For 16 days he was detained. Last year was the first year he could bear to hear the christmas fireworks, and even still, loud noise make him unseasy or angry all together.

When the questions were definitely over, he walked me outside to say goodbye. The hand shake he gave me in closing was more or less the same as the one I received in greeting. However, it was accompanied by a smile.